Hi all.

How can we apply the modular multiplicative inverse when calculating

(n choose k) mod p, where 'p' is a prime number.

If you could suggest some related problems, it would be very helpful.

Thanks in advance.

**Moderator:** Board moderators

4 posts
• Page **1** of **1**

Hi all.

How can we apply the modular multiplicative inverse when calculating

(n choose k) mod p, where 'p' is a prime number.

If you could suggest some related problems, it would be very helpful.

Thanks in advance.

How can we apply the modular multiplicative inverse when calculating

(n choose k) mod p, where 'p' is a prime number.

If you could suggest some related problems, it would be very helpful.

Thanks in advance.

- joshi13
- New poster
**Posts:**9**Joined:**Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:18 am

You could use Lucas's theorem.

- mf
- Guru
**Posts:**1244**Joined:**Mon Feb 28, 2005 4:51 am**Location:**Zürich, Switzerland

There is another, more "mechanical", but more general, approach. It can be applied to any formula containing factorials over some modulo.

C_n^k = n! / (k! (n-k)!)

Let's learn how to compute n! mod p, but factorial without factors p and so on:

n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * _1_ * (p+1) * (p+2) * ... * (2p-1) * _2_ * (2p+1) * (2p+2) * ... * n.

We took the usual factorial, but excluded all factors of p (1 instead of p, 2 instead of 2p, and so on).

I name this 'strange factorial'.

If n is not very large, we can calculate this simply, then GOTO END_SCARY_MATHS

If p is not large, then GOTO BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:

Else - skip the rest of the post

BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:

After taking each factor mod p, we get:

n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 2 * 1 * 2 * ... * n.

So 'strange factorial' is really several blocks of construction:

1 * 2 * 3 * ... * (p-1) * i

where i is a 1-indexed index of block taken again without factors p ('strange index' ).

The last block could be not full. More precisely, there will be floor(n/p) full blocks and some tail (its result we can compute easily, in O(P)).

The result in each block is multiplication 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1), which is common to all blocks, and multiplication of all 'strange indices' i from 1 to floor(n/p).

But multiplication of all 'strange indices' is really a 'strange factorial' again, so we can compute it recursively. Note, that in recursive calls n reduces exponentially, so this is rather fast algorithm.

So... After so much brainfucking maths I must give a code

Asymptotic... There are log_p n iterations of while, inside it there O(p) multiplications, and calculation of power, that can be done in O(log n). So asymptotic is O ((log_p n) (p + log n)).

Unfortunately I didn't check the code on any online judge, but the idea (which was explained by Andrew Stankevich) is surely right.

END_SCARY_MATHS:

So, we can now compute this 'strange factorial' modulo p. Because p is prime, and we've excluded all multiples of p, then the result would be different from zero. This means we can compute inverse for them, and compute C_n^k = n!* / (k!* (n-k)!*) (mod p).

But, of course, before all this, we should check, if p was in the same power in the nominator and denominator of the fraction. If it was indeed in the same power, then we can divide by it, and we get exactly these 'strange factorials'. If the power of p in nominator was greater, then the result will obviously be 0. The last case, when power in denominator is greater than in nominator, is obviously incorrect (the fraction won't be integer).

P.S. How to compute power of prime p in n! ? Easy formula: n/p + n/(p^2) + n/(p^3) + ...

C_n^k = n! / (k! (n-k)!)

Let's learn how to compute n! mod p, but factorial without factors p and so on:

n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * _1_ * (p+1) * (p+2) * ... * (2p-1) * _2_ * (2p+1) * (2p+2) * ... * n.

We took the usual factorial, but excluded all factors of p (1 instead of p, 2 instead of 2p, and so on).

I name this 'strange factorial'.

If n is not very large, we can calculate this simply, then GOTO END_SCARY_MATHS

If p is not large, then GOTO BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:

Else - skip the rest of the post

BEGIN_SCARY_MATHS:

After taking each factor mod p, we get:

n!* mod p = 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1) * 2 * 1 * 2 * ... * n.

So 'strange factorial' is really several blocks of construction:

1 * 2 * 3 * ... * (p-1) * i

where i is a 1-indexed index of block taken again without factors p ('strange index' ).

The last block could be not full. More precisely, there will be floor(n/p) full blocks and some tail (its result we can compute easily, in O(P)).

The result in each block is multiplication 1 * 2 * ... * (p-1), which is common to all blocks, and multiplication of all 'strange indices' i from 1 to floor(n/p).

But multiplication of all 'strange indices' is really a 'strange factorial' again, so we can compute it recursively. Note, that in recursive calls n reduces exponentially, so this is rather fast algorithm.

So... After so much brainfucking maths I must give a code

- Code: Select all
`int factmod (int n, int p) {`

long long res = 1;

while (n > 1) {

long long cur = 1;

for (int i=2; i<p; ++i)

cur = (cur * i) % p;

res = (res * powmod (cur, n/p, p)) % p;

for (int i=2; i<=n%p; ++i)

res = (res * i) % p;

n /= p;

}

return int (res % p);

}

Asymptotic... There are log_p n iterations of while, inside it there O(p) multiplications, and calculation of power, that can be done in O(log n). So asymptotic is O ((log_p n) (p + log n)).

Unfortunately I didn't check the code on any online judge, but the idea (which was explained by Andrew Stankevich) is surely right.

END_SCARY_MATHS:

So, we can now compute this 'strange factorial' modulo p. Because p is prime, and we've excluded all multiples of p, then the result would be different from zero. This means we can compute inverse for them, and compute C_n^k = n!* / (k!* (n-k)!*) (mod p).

But, of course, before all this, we should check, if p was in the same power in the nominator and denominator of the fraction. If it was indeed in the same power, then we can divide by it, and we get exactly these 'strange factorials'. If the power of p in nominator was greater, then the result will obviously be 0. The last case, when power in denominator is greater than in nominator, is obviously incorrect (the fraction won't be integer).

P.S. How to compute power of prime p in n! ? Easy formula: n/p + n/(p^2) + n/(p^3) + ...

- maxdiver
- Learning poster
**Posts:**51**Joined:**Tue Sep 04, 2007 2:12 pm**Location:**Russia, Saratov

Thanks guys, that theorem and the general approach have proven to be very useful.

- joshi13
- New poster
**Posts:**9**Joined:**Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:18 am

4 posts
• Page **1** of **1**

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests